This morning it was reported in the Salt Lake Tribune that The Leonardo will go before the City Council tonight with a request for a $600,000 loan to pay salaries. Really? They’ve spent all their finances on the capital project and now don’t have enough to keep their staff. I’m not sure this bodes well for the future.
The preservation ethic that’s been established at The Leo also doesn’t bode well for the future. The city received a grant from FEMA to do seismic stabilization to the former library building. Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, providing these federal funds required that impacts to the building from a new seismic system be reviewed by the Utah State Historic Preservation Office and interested consulting parties, of which Utah Heritage Foundation was one. Utah Heritage Foundation helped make the case that the former Main Library is a significant structure that is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places even though it had not reached the 50 year age mark. We spent more than two years in intensive discussions with representatives of The Leonardo, FEMA, state emergency management, and Salt Lake City Public Services and Engineering. On several walk-throughs of the building, we collectively identified the character defining features of the building to be preserved including the large plate glass windows, cast concrete panels, sculptural mural on the south side, leaflights, escalators, the auditorium, and several areas of extensive wood and marble paneling.
After many meetings, an agreement was reached about the best type of seismic system to be installed in this historic structure and how to lessen its impacts to the character defining features of the building. These features were then protected during the renovation in order to satisfy the FEMA grant. At the time of a walk through to see a “nearly completed” project (April 2011), we saw that all of the historic features were intact and in good condition. The Leonardo indicated that they were within 1-2 months of opening and we walked away feeling good that the public would have a chance to experience the former library in a new way. It’s exactly how the Section 106 process should work successfully.
Unfortunate