Preservation Round-Up

Thoughts and updates from Utah Heritage Foundation

Sep 02
2011

Demolition of 17 buildings proposed in Pleasant Grove - UHF position statement

Posted by: kirk

IMG_0346_resizedProposed Development Plan for Pleasant Grove Civic Center

Position Statement 

September 2, 2011

Utah Heritage Foundation strongly believes that the proposed Pleasant Grove civic center development plan has the potential to immensely impact the Pleasant Grove National Register Historic District through the demolition of fourteen National Register-listed historic structures.  We urge the Mayor and City Council to reconsider the proposed development plan putting rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, and historic preservation of the city’s unique structures at the forefront.  Considering the reuse of structures is a wise approach, not only from the viewpoint of preserving the city’s character, but also an approach that puts environmental and financial sustainability first.

How you can help

Deliver your comments to the following elected and administrative officials at Pleasant Grove City:

Mayor Bruce Call                                mayor@pgcity.org

Cindy Boyd, City Council                     cindytboyd@gmail.com

Val Danklef, City Council                    vdanklef@gmail.com

Lee Jensen, City Council                     groupjensen@comcast.net

Kimberly Robinson, City Council         krobinson@pgcity.org

Jeff Wilson, City Council                     jwilson@pgcity.org

Please copy Utah Heritage Foundation with your comments.  Send them to Kirk Huffaker, Executive Director at kirk@utahheritagefoundation.org.

Mention any or all of the following points:

            • Demolishing 17 registered historic buildings will create a void in the National Register Historic District that is unacceptable.

            • A sustainable approach for Pleasant Grove’s future is important, one that includes historic preservation and adaptive use.

            • Request that the city reconsider the proposed development plan for the civic center, putting historic preservation first.

            • Request that the city not purchase or demolish any properties within the proposed development plan area until funding to build a new structure has been secured.

IMG_0358_resizedPreservation Issues

Pleasant Grove’s National Register Historic District could be dismantled by an ambitious new plan for its traditional town center.  Historically the location of the first settlement in the Battle Creek Fort, the town center currently has many of the major elements needed for a successful and walkable downtown:  city hall, fire station, recreation center, library, open space and playgrounds, business district, and attractive housing.

Recently proposed by Pleasant Grove City, the development plan aims to build five major and separate new city structures including a city hall, library, police station, fire station, and arts center within the historic district.  The proposed plan consumes one full block that is already occupied by residential structures with a new city park.

In order to execute this plan, the city would need to obtain and demolish twenty-five buildings, many of those being private residences.  Seventeen of these buildings are historic and were listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 1995 as part of the Pleasant Grove Historic District.  While we respect the city’s desire for larger or modern facilities to serve its residents, building new municipal structures should not come at the expense of demolishing economically viable historic structures that are currently being used and can continue to be used for the foreseeable future.

City Policy Supports Historic Preservation

In the past five years, Pleasant Grove City has published several policy documents that support historic preservation.

In 2008, the city published the following as their Downtown Vision Statement at the beginning of the Downtown 2020 Plan:

           “Downtown Pleasant Grove will become a vibrant village of mixed uses, promoting a pedestrian friendly atmosphere and providing excellence in landscaping and    architecture, in a setting which honors and preserves the past while promoting the future.”  We believe that this statement clearly communicates a desire for a vibrant  historic preservation program.

Developed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, Main Street is a popular, successful national program communities implement for downtown revitalization.  Main Street’s four point approach was included in the Pleasant Grove Downtown 2020 Plan as the training model and methodology.  While the four points do not specifically include historic preservation, they also do not include demolition.  On the contrary, economist Donovan Rypkema has noted that “there is not one single successful downtown revitalization program in the United States that does not have historic preservation and rehabilitation as a key element of its plan.”

In January 2006, a panel of national planning, design, economic, and revitalization experts prepared a R/UDAT report for Pleasant Grove.  R/UDAT, or rural/urban design assistance team, is a program of the American Institute of Architects that provides a comprehensive look at the strengths and weaknesses, challenges and opportunities of a community from an outside perspective.  This report notes the benefits of historic preservation in several sections:

            Challenges and Opportunities:  “There appears to be an opportunity to make it easier to find Pleasant Grove, and to differentiate it from other cities in the valley. Increasing the visibility and aware­ness of Downtown Pleasant Grove and the heritage and culture of the city will encourage travelers to visit.”

            The Block and the Building:  “The preservation and renewal of historic buildings should be facilitated to affirm the continuity and evolution of society.”

            Preservation and New Development:  “Strengthen protections for historic buildings;” “Encourage the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of historic buildings.”

The R/UDAT report also recommends building a city hall that combines several city functions into one structure.  Building one structure could have many positive aspects:  increase the efficiency of city functions; streamline the construction of several new city structures; preserve open space and historic structures that are not city owned; and, free-up additional space in existing buildings for other public or private uses.  However, the proposed civic center plan does not follow that recommendation.

The Pleasant Grove General Plan (2007) reinforces the conclusions of the R/UDAT report by including the following statement:

            Preservation and New Development:  “Preserve and rehabilitate contributing historic buildings, redevelop inadequate non-contributing buildings, and develop new infill development on vacant sites.”

The R/UDAT study (2006), Pleasant Grove General Plan (2007), Downtown 2020 Plan (2008),  and Civic Center Proposed Development Plan Request for Proposals (2010) all incorporated strong policy statements to support historic preservation and turn of the century design in downtown Pleasant Grove.  However, by proposing the demolition of seventeen viable historic structures, we believe the city is moving in the opposite direction of their stated policies.

IMG_0366_resizedHistory

Built between 1853-1945, the types, styles, and materials used in this district cover a broad spectrum.  It features turn-of-the-century dwellings and increasingly rare architectural forms such as the hall-parlor, temple-form, crosswing and double crosswing, and central-block-with-projecting-bays house types employing Gothic Revival, Federal, Italianate, and Victorian styling.  Various bungalow types and styles built between 1914 and the early 1930s, English Tudor and English Cottage styles built in the late 1920s and early 1930s, and an Art Moderne style, are also represented within the district boundaries.  Many of the houses built before 1890 are of adobe or a locally quarried stone known as soft-rock.

According to the published plan, seventeen structures contributing and listed structures within the Pleasant Grove National Register Historic District are threatened with demolition by this plan.  This includes many of the city’s prominent religious and residential structures that were constructed subsequent to the 1850 pioneer fort.  The structures include the following:

55 East 200 South                                Victorian Eclectic                                 Orpheus Dance Hall/Old Gym

41 East 200 South                                Prairie School                                       LDS Seminary

119 East 200 South                              Vernacular, Greek Revival                  Ashton-Driggs House

139 East 200 South                              Post-war cottage

155 East 200 South                              Post-war cottage

171 East 200 South                              Post-war cottage

191 East 200 South                              Neoclassical Bungalow                        Franklin Banks House

90 E. Center St.                                     Arts & Crafts Bungalow                       John Huchel House

108 E. Center St.                                  Bungalow

146 E. Center St.                                  Bungalow

182 E. Center St.                                  Vernacular, Crosswing                        Louis P. Lund House

133 East 100 South                              Bungalow

150 East 100 South                              Bungalow

161 East 100 South                              Bungalow                                               Charles J. Olsen House

189 East 100 South                              Victorian Eclectic cottage                   Lewis Lund House

190 East 100 South                              Vernacular, Hall-Parlor

160 South 200 East                              Bungalow

Several buildings in Pleasant Grove were listed on the National Register individually prior to the historic district in 1995.  For example, the Ashton-Driggs House (119 East 200 South) is one of the finest examples of the Greek Revival style in the state.  Built in 1865, its monumentalism is expressed in local stone that is two feet thick.  The building also served as an important residence for early town settlers, as well as the father of the nationally renowned King Sisters.  Yet it is threatened with demolition by the proposed town center development plan, to be replaced by a park.

Only five National Register-listed structures that have been spared by the proposed development plan, all of which are owned either by the Daughters of Utah Pioneers or Pleasant Grove City.  These include:

61 South 100 East                                Vernacular, Greek Revival                 Old Bell School

95 South 100 East                                Vernacular, Hall-Parlor                       DUP Pioneer Cabin

107 South 100 East                              Vernacular, Greek Revival                 Pleasant Grove Town Hall

155 South 100 East                              Vernacular                                            Jacob Winter Corral

35 S. Main Street                                 Art Moderne                                        Pleasant Grove City Hall

While these five significant structures are important to save, doing so does not adequately recognize the full breadth of Pleasant Grove’s history as they are all public buildings.  Therefore, Utah Heritage Foundation strongly encourages the reconsideration of the proposed town center development plan by Pleasant Grove City.

Comments (2)Add Comment
0
URGENT! Save P.G. City's Hstorical Landmarks!
written by Marilyn Shoell Hess, September 06, 2011
Thank you so much for this amazing article! I am the daughter of Ruth Beck Shoell, who grew up in the Beck Home, which is the Arts & Crafts Bungalow , Beck/John Huchel House on 90 East Center. I attended a Public Hearing on Aug. 16th in Pleasant Grove City. There were many concerned citizens in attendance that voiced their concerns. Mayor Call said that the "Beck home was scheduled for demolition, and that we "DIDN'T NEED TO WORRY ABOUT THE MAP". If we do not need to worry about the map, why did Kirk Huffaker from the Ut. Heritage Foundation have it?

I was extremely concerned and contacted Kirk Huffaker the next day. He actually had the "proposed plans" on his desk and was writing his reply to PG City. He agreed with my concern.

There is an article in the Daily Herald written about this and I was misquoted on a few things. My family is not getting the house for free. The only offer made was that the city would put the cost of demolition of the Beck/Huchel Home towards the cost of moving it. Nothing in writing.
My family took excellent care of this home and continued the long going Christmas Light Tradition. The city did not take care of this historical site like they should have.

Donald Hartley, Historical Architect listed the home in "overall excellent condition," in his 1999 observations when the home was sold to the city. In 2005, he stated that he was impressed (again) with the condition of the building and its potential for reuse.
I talked to Donald Hartley on Aug 17th, 2011 right after my conversation with Kirk Huffaker and he still believes the building is in good shape and does not represent a public hazard.

Mayor Call said in the article written by the daily hearald sept. 1, 2011 that "The home is in poor shape, but has sentimental value to many." Donald Hartley said, "The Beck/Huchel Home has PUBLIC VALUE. It's not just and ancestral home for the family, it is part of the community and could be saved without much effort."

In the Sept./Oct. 2011 Utah Valley Magazine there is an article about Bruce Call "Marketable Mayor" from PG. He is quoted as saying, "We weren't just making a new logo, we wanted to create a new identity for the city."
I think anyone who was raised and grew up in Pleasant Grove do not think Pleasant Grove needs a new idently. The proposed theme that Bruce Call is wanting for Pleasant Grove is "Turn of the 19th Century design style." Why would you tear down history to build new buildings with a 19th Centurty design? Why not use Pleasant Grove's history and restore our history?

Mayor Bruce Call said in the Daily Herald article, Sept 1st, 2011 that they were "considering demolishing the house when it contracted to demolish several home on Locust Ave." He said the Beck home was scheduled for demolition in the Public hearing on Aug. 16th. In fact, I asked him several times to hold off and I never got a reply.

We are in the process of getting the minutes from this meeting.

In a PDF file off of the Pleasant Grove City Web-site I found the following information.
Dated March 17th, 2010
Requests for Proposals for the Pleasant Grove Civic Center Facility Needs Assessment and Conceptual Design.
Page 3. #2 b) All existing City buildings may be removed or replaced.

Obviously, the history of Pleasant Grove means nothing to Mayor Call. He wants Pleasant Grove to have a "new identity."

Thank you for your help!
Marilyn Shoell Hess
Daughter of Bob & Ruth Shoell
Granddaughter of Earl & Ilene Beck




0
URGENT! Save P.G. City's Hstorical Landmarks!
written by Marilyn Shoell Hess, September 06, 2011
Kirk,
Thank you for your help! smilies/smiley.gif

The article is amazing and I agree with everything you say.

Marilyn Shoell Hess

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
Preserving, protecting and promoting Utah’s historic built environment.
joinus.gif

Renew your membership

Sign Up for our ENEWSletter!
* indicates required

Preservation Blogroll

Utah History, Preservation, and Architecture Blogs

DesignBuildBLUFF Blog

Emery County Archives

Now & Then: Utah's Present History

Researching the Utah State Archives

salt lake architecture

Salt Lake City History Examiner

Utah Modern

utah-rchitecture

Utah State Capitol Visitor Services

National Preservation Blogs

Gozaic-Go with a Purpose Heritage Travel

LDS Architecture

National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Sites blog

PlaceEconomics blog

Preservation Nation

Media Blogs on Architecture

Architecture and the Urban Landscape-Cleveland Plain Dealer

Changing Skyline-Philadephia Inquirer

Cityscapes-Chicago Tribune

David W. Dunlap-New York Times

Looking Around-Time

Friends

Charles Phoenix

The Inkblotter at the King's English

Links do not constitute an endorsement bloggers' positions and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of UHF.  Contact us with questions about this blogroll.

Tags

adaptive use advocacy advocacy alert AIA Utah AIA Young Architects Forum APA Utah appeal archaeology awards barns Bear River Heritage Area Bountiful Box Elder County Brigham City Cache County Carbon County Cedar City Centerville CLGs College of Architecture + Planning compatible infill Congress cool stuff dance pavilions Davis County Delta demolished documentation Draper easements economics education Envision Utah events Fairfield farms Fish Lake folk arts for sale Frank Lloyd Wright funding green preservation guidelines Gunnison HABS/HAER/HALS heritage tourism historic districts historic landscapes historic markers historic structures report history how to rehab Hurricane internships Iron County issues job openings Kanarraville LEED Leeds legal issues legislature localism Logan Main Street masonry Memorial House Moab Modernism Mormon Pioneer National Heritage Area Murray museum National Register National Trust New Harmony news newsletter topics Ogden ordinances out of state Palm Springs Panguitch Park City Parowan Partners in the Field PechaKucha people Pleasant Grove position statements preservation planning Preserve America Provo public meetings Recent Past rehabilitation Rich County Richmond rural preservation Salt Lake City Salt Lake County Salt Lake Modern salvage Sanpete County Save America's Treasures saved school Sevier County slideshow South Salt Lake Spring City St. George state parks Summit County sustainability take action tax credits TBSI teardowns theaters Tooele County Torrey tours Tremonton UHF fundraiser Uintah County University of Utah UTA Utah Barn Alliance Utah County Utah Preservation Conference video volunteers Wayne County Weber County Weber County Heritage Foundation Wendover West Jordan West Valley City Where's Kirk? windows workshops

Support UHF with your online purchase!

rei_logo1

Events Calendar